As Mental Floss reports, a hypothetical “Battle of New York” may have played out in 1781 if George Washington had his way. If victory was found in this scenario, then the British command structure may have been irreparably damaged. This possibility remained very real for the British forces in New York, due in large part to their enemy’s oven-based deception tactics (via allthingsliberty.com) and elaborate spy network. Consequently, they remained in the city on the defensive. With this in mind, the Continental Army’s French allies overrode Washington’s desires in favor of attacking Yorktown, as British General Cornwallis would accordingly not receive aid from New York. 

Cornwallis is perhaps best remembered for his informal surrender at the conclusion of this siege, sending a subordinate to meet with Washington in his place. However, it is worth bearing in mind that this apparent rebuff of custom was likely not so much out of scorn than personal embarrassment. His vain efforts to achieve victory had been based on false hope, and while he may not have known the war would mostly end with his defeat, he knew that the loss of his 7,000 men was a devastating blow to his country and reputation.

Miscommunication set the stage for victory at Yorktown

Print Collector/Getty Images