In a move that most would consider long overdue, the NCAA’s governing board voted unanimously that college athletes should be allowed to receive compensation for their efforts. The vote, which was held in October, functions similarly to how federal and state legislation works — now that the “federal” governing board of the NCAA has voted, it’s up to the three divisions to decide on specific rules and details.

According to CNBC, the decision is “a major shift for the NCAA, a [multi-billion dollar] corporation which had historically been steadfast in prohibiting college athletes from being paid, in order to preserve its amateurism rules.” This often sparked outrage among the public, who watched as institutions and corporations raked in obscene profits from athletes’ likenesses, while the athletes risked permanent injury and future professional viability in the name of their team. To add insult to injury, many top-tier coaches receive seven-figure salaries, without assuming any of the physical risk, while players aren’t even allowed to monetize their Youtube channels.

But before you start slipping Junior ‘roids in every bowl of porridge, note that athletes are still years away from seeing any money. California, the first state to pass legislation in favor of student athlete compensation with its “Fair Pay to Play Act,” has already seen backlash from the NCAA, which has stated it is “likely unconstitutional.” 

Even if it isn’t, the law isn’t set to take effect until 2023, and each NCAA division has until Jan. 2021 to create its own rule set.

Greenbacks for redshirts?

Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images